Entries by Richard (1741)

Friday
Jun052015

Provide feedback on the zero draft of the outcome document for the UN Summit to adopt the Post-2015 Development Agenda

We have received the following email from Susan Alzner, NGLS 

Dear Colleagues,

On 2 June 2015, the zero draft was released of the outcome document for the UN Summit to adopt the Post-2015 Development Agenda. It is available here

The draft outcome document will be the subject of intergovernmental negotiations at the UN from 22-25 June, 20-24 July and 27-31 July...

Click to read more ...

Wednesday
Jun032015

Zero draft of outcome document now available

The zero draft of the outcome document of the UN Summit on Post 2015 in September has been released. It will be discussed during the forthcoming session of the intergovernmental negotiations (IGN) on June 22-25th.  

It is entitled Transforming our World by 2030 — A new Agenda for Global Action and comprises the four components of the Agenda: an opening Declaration; the Sustainable Development Goals and targets; Means of implementation and the Global Partnership; and Follow-up and Review. 

It also includes three annexes. The first is the paper of the Co-facilitators proposing revisions to 21 of the 169 targets, which they strongly recommend to member states. The second is the ‘food for thought paper’ on a possible Technological Facilitation Mechanism and the third, for reference, is the ‘Introduction of the Open Working Group Proposal for Sustainable development goals and targets’.

Tuesday
Jun022015

Co-facilitator post letter on themes of interactive dialogues for post-2015 Summit

Following our posting on 27 May (see: Post-2015 development agenda session on follow-up and review, 18-22 May No 14: Thematic dialogues), a letter from the post-2015 co-facilitators containing the themes for the six interactive dialogues to be held during the post-2015 Summit has been posted.

The modalities for how these six interactive dialogues will be organized are outlined in General Assembly resolution 69/244 (annex II) (see: http://undocs.org/A/69/L.43). 

Sunday
May312015

TST – Selected Follow-up and Review Processes and Platforms: An illustrative, non-exhaustive compilation – ICPD Beyond 2014 Monitoring Framework cited

At the end of the 5th session of intergovernmental negotiations, the UN Technical Support Team released a list of existing mechanisms that could be used for follow-up and review of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), to support discussions on the post-2015 development agenda. The document, which is entitled ‘TST – Selected Follow-up and Review Processes and Platforms: An illustrative, non-exhaustive compilation,' includes potential review mechanisms which could address cross-cutting issues.

They include, for example, the UN General Assembly, the UN Economic and Social Council's (ECOSOC) Annual Ministerial Review (AMR), the High-Level Political Forum (HLPF), UN Statistical Commission, the UN Commission on Population and Development, UN Human Rights Council, and the UN regional commissions...

Click to read more ...

Friday
May292015

High-level Political Forum: next meeting 26 June to 8 July, further information

Following up on posting on the next meeting of the High-level Political Forum, (See: High-level Political Forum: next meeting 26 June to 8 July 2015), the integrated programme for session to be held under the auspices of ECOSOC (26 June-8 July) and the ECOSOC Annual Ministerial Review (9-10 July) is now available.

Nominations for HLPF round table lead discussants are being requested by the  ECOSOC President would like to include lead discussants from the nine major groups and other stakeholders in the various round tables that will be organised during the HLPF.  See attached invitation for nominations for these lead discussants as well as attached a nomination form. The deadline for submitting nominations is Monday, 1 June...

Click to read more ...

Thursday
May282015

Post-2015 development agenda session on follow-up and review, 18-22 May No 15: Goals, targets and indicators

(based on IISD Reporting Services report)

Goals, targets and indicators 

On the morning of Thursday 21 May, Ambassador Kamau introduced the “Revised Targets Document” from the Co-Facilitators. (See: Post-2015: revised proposal for the themes of the six interactive dialogues to be held during the post-2015 Summit) The tweaking of the targets had been based on two criteria: to replace the ‘x’s in the OWG’s report with text or values, for which there had seemed to be “a measure of comfort” from what delegates had said during the March session; and to ensure consistency with existing international agreements...

Click to read more ...

Wednesday
May272015

Post-2015 development agenda session on follow-up and review, 18-22 May No 14: Thematic dialogues

The revised themes for the thematic dialogues was introduced on Thursday. During the discussions Egypt and other countries, particularly from the Arab Region voiced their objections to the inclusion of “vulnerable groups” under the theme Tackling inequalities, empowering women and girls and leaving no-one behind. They would accept the use of “people in vulnerable situations”. 

Ambassador Kamau, Co-facilitator, responded in saying that the term was “Rio+20 language” but no agreement could be reached on this matter by Thursday afternoon. It was then raised again on Friday morning, when Egypt said that they also accept the use of the term “the vulnerable”.  Ambassador Kamau then said that the problem appeared to be with the word “groups”...

Click to read more ...

Tuesday
May262015

Post-2015 development agenda session on follow-up and review, 18-22 May No 13: Civil society participation in the IGN going forward

Civil society has been engaged in the intergovernmental negotiations (IGN) since the beginning of the year through the interactive dialogues with civil society at each session. At the beginning of the interactive dialogue on Wednesday 20 May, Ambassador Kamau, speaking on behalf of both Co-facilitators, welcomed the positive engaged with civil society, also noting that some had expressed concerns that the representation in speaking had not been as balanced as it should be. This was something that they had tried to address. 

He said that the Co-facilitators were aware that some concerns have been expressed about access and that they wished to reassure civil society that they will continue to champion their access to these meetings, even at those points that might be sensitive and difficult...

Click to read more ...

Saturday
May232015

Post-2015 development agenda session on follow-up and review, 18-22 May – No 12: TST — Selected Follow-up and Review Processes and Platforms

The TST has completed its document on follow-up and review processes and platforms

It should be noted that  it includes the Commission on Population and Development (page 3) and also the ICPD Beyond 2014 Monitoring Framework under Goal 3 (page 9)

Under Goal 5 , the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, other Human Rights  Treat bodies and the Universal Periodic Review are cited in addition to the Commission on the Status of Women (pages 12 & 13)

Saturday
May232015

Post-2015 development agenda session on follow-up and review, 18 -22 May – No 11: Preliminary Impressions on Follow-up and review by the co-facilitators 19 May 2015 

Ambassador David Donoghue gave the preliminary informal impressions of the Co-facilitators in summing up the discussions on follow–up and review of the previous sessions of the intergovernmental negotiating body.

  • We wish to share some preliminary impressions, which we garnered from two days of rich debate. 
  • Reassuring to see that we all share the conviction that implementation of the SDGs depends on – and is actually the main purpose of- a well-functioning and effective review framework. Discussion showed that you concur on many points. But we will clearly need some more discussion and reflection on some aspects. 
  • The first thing we have to agree on is the terminology. Should we speak about a “Monitoring and accountability framework” or a “follow-up and review framework”? Different processes use different terminologies...

Click to read more ...