(from Stan Bernstein and supported by Commonwealth Medical Trust (Commat))
From the perspective of the SRHR community, the SDSN recommendations leave much to be desired. Sexual and reproductive health are included in several places but with formulations that do not give it much priority or coherence. For example, the realization of sexual and reproductive health rights are seen as instrumental to voluntary fertility decline “in countries above [3] children per woman” and relevant for the continuation of voluntary fertility reduction in countries above replacement level fertility in their statement of Target 2c. This does not capture the breadth of SRH concerns and the universality of rights in this area (especially to make voluntary and informed choices about the number, timing and spacing of one’s children) independent of fertility levels. SRH is also recognized as a component of “universal coverage of quality health care”. Other elements of women’s empowerment (including gender based violence) and health (maternal mortality ratios and rates) are included elsewhere and some links to other elements of economic and social development and environmental sustainability are noted. But there is a diminution of status relative to the independent MDG target 5B. However, the goal and target levels are considered to be frozen. (Comments/complaints are unlikely to be productive, but may be useful to stake a claim against that freeze in later discussions.)
Click to read more ...