Joint Statement of the Chairpersons of the United Nations Human Rights Treaty Bodies on the Post-2015 Development Agenda 
Wednesday, February 4, 2015 at 9:00PM
Richard in Post-2015

As Chairpersons of the ten UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies (1), we recognize the fundamental importance of the current discussions on the post-2015 development agenda. We recall that the 2005 World Summit acknowledged that peace and security, development, and human rights are the three pillars of the United Nations system and recognised that “development, peace and security and human rights are interlinked and mutually reinforcing.” We believe that the human rights treaty bodies have an important role to play in contributing to both the finalization and implementation of the post-2015 development agenda.

We recall our previous statement of May 2013, and recognize the progress since made, including the integration of important human rights elements in the Open Working Group’s 17 draft Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and 169 targets, as well as the emphasis placed on human rights in the Secretary-General’s synthesis report of December 2014 ‘The Road to Dignity: Ending Poverty, Transforming All lives and Protecting the Planet.’ We believe that this provides a basis for a new and effective universal development agenda grounded in freedom from fear and freedom from want for all, without discrimination. 

The emphasis placed by the Open-Working Group and the Secretary-General’s reports on equality and non-discrimination, including two dedicated equality goals on gender equality and equality within and between countries, is crucial. Previous development efforts failed to produce sufficient improvements in the plight of the marginalized, disempowered and excluded, including women, children, minorities, indigenous peoples, migrants, older persons, persons with disabilities and the poor. Even where overall progress was positive, inequalities and inter-sectional discrimination have dramatically increased between social groups, countries and between regions. The inclusion of non-discrimination and social cohesion targets is, therefore, an important step towards a development agenda that leaves no-one behind. 

We strongly urge Member States to maintain - and, indeed, strengthen - consistent alignment with, and references to, human rights, by recognising and including, inter alia:

In this context, we strongly support the Secretary-General’s calling on Member States to include a ‘technical review’ of the goals and targets in order to ensure that they are ambitious whist also measurable, achievable and consistent with existing international standards and agreements, including human rights treaties. 

We welcome the emphasis placed on accountability and call for this to be strengthened. We strongly agree with the Secretary-General’s call for a ‘robust and participatory monitoring and review framework’ for the SDGs at the national, regional and global levels, with a systematic and institutionalized flow of information from and to existing monitoring mechanisms, including the human rights treaty bodies, in order to ensure synergies between existing mechanisms and a post-2015 monitoring and review framework. 

In this regard, we further believe that Member States should build upon the principles and inclusive working methods of existing mechanisms such as the Human Rights Treaty Bodies, as well as the Universal Periodic Review of the UN Human Rights Council. 

Bearing in mind the many gains which are to be drawn from harnessing the energy and resources of the private sector to ensure the successful implementation of the SDGs, accountability mechanisms should also include accountability of the private sector. We underline the relevance of the work of the human rights treaty bodies in the area of corporate sector accountability (2) and call upon Member States to endorse the call for the full application of the United Nations’ Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, as referred to in the Secretary-General’s Synthesis report.

We emphasize that measuring progress in achieving development goals should include an assessment of the contribution of such measurement processes to the protection of fundamental rights and freedoms. In addition, we stress the need for reliable and validated means of measuring progress in meeting development goals. Indicators should be based upon appropriately disaggregated data, derived from, and taking account of, new technologies. 

In our own work, we will encourage our Committees to consider the impact of development goals on the enjoyment of the rights in our respective treaties. We will also encourage the Committees to draw on development data and reports, as appropriate, in our Committees’ constructive dialogue with States. 

The importance of a successful conclusion to this agenda-setting process cannot be underestimated. We encourage Member States and all stakeholders during these last stages of the intergovernmental negotiations to rise to the challenge of adopting a truly transformative, universal, and human rights-based development agenda that protects human dignity and contributes to the realization of human rights for all without discrimination.

18 January 2015

Notes:
1. Human Rights Committee, Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women, Committee Against Torture, Committee on the Rights of the Child, Committee on Migrant Workers, Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Sub-Committee on the Prevention of Torture and Committee on Enforced Disappearances.
2. Committee on the Rights of the Child, General Comment No.16 on State obligations regarding the impact of the business sector on children’s rights (CRC/C/GC/16); Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Statement on the Obligations of States parties regarding the Corporate Sector and Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (E/C.12/2011/1).

See more at: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=15505&LangID=E#sthash.FUiTdohn.dpuf

Article originally appeared on NGOs Beyond 2014 (http://ngosbeyond2014.org/).
See website for complete article licensing information.